The Laws › Commandment #137
Commandment #137 · Positive · Courts & Justice

Judges and Officers in All Thy Gates

שֹׁפְטִים וְשֹׁטְרִים
Source: Deuteronomy 16:18  ·  Maimonides, Sefer HaMitzvot, Positive #137

'Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates... and they shall judge the people with just judgment.' Deuteronomy 16:18 establishes courts of law in every city — the foundation the next several commandments build on. But an institution is only as good as the people inside it: when Samuel made his own sons judges, they 'turned aside after lucre, and took bribes, and perverted judgment' (1 Samuel 8:3), a failure that led Israel to ask for a king. Centuries later, King Jehoshaphat rebuilt the system 'city by city' (2 Chronicles 19:5) and charged his judges directly: 'ye judge not for man, but for the LORD, who is with you in the judgment.'

Judges and Officers in All Thy Gates

שֹׁפְטִים וְשֹׁטְרִים תִּתֶּן לְךָ בְּכָל שְׁעָרֶיךָ אֲשֶׁר יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לְךָ לִשְׁבָטֶיךָ וְשָׁפְטוּ אֶת הָעָם מִשְׁפַּט צֶדֶק
"Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates, which the LORD thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes: and they shall judge the people with just judgment."

The commandment is architectural before it is moral: "Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates." Not one central court for the whole nation, and not justice left to whoever happens to be strongest in a given town — a court in every gate, in every city, reachable by the people who live there. The phrase "thy gates" is doing real work. The city gate was where business was transacted, where elders sat, where disputes were heard (the same setting #133 found Absalom exploiting at the gate of the king's house). Deuteronomy 16:18 takes that existing social space and assigns it a function: "and they shall judge the people with just judgment."

This is the foundation the next three commandments (#138-140) build on. A court in every gate is necessary, but a building with judges in it is not yet justice — it is only the possibility of justice. What happens inside that building is what the rest of this cluster addresses.

His Sons Walked Not in His Ways

וְלֹא הָלְכוּ בָנָיו בִּדְרָכָיו וַיִּטּוּ אַחֲרֵי הַבָּצַע וַיִּקְחוּ שֹׁחַד וַיַּטּוּ מִשְׁפָּט
"And his sons walked not in his ways, but turned aside after lucre, and took bribes, and perverted judgment."

The first test of Deuteronomy 16:18 in the narrative books is a failure, and it happens close to home. When Samuel grew old, he "made his sons judges over Israel" (1 Samuel 8:1). The arrangement should have been a model — judges appointed by the most trusted prophet in the land. Instead, 1 Samuel 8:3 records the result in the plainest terms: Samuel's sons "turned aside after lucre, and took bribes, and perverted judgment." The very office Deuteronomy 16:18 establishes — judgment in the gates — became, in the hands of Samuel's own sons, an instrument for selling judgment to whoever could pay.

The elders of Israel respond by going to Samuel and saying plainly, "thy sons walk not in thy ways" (1 Samuel 8:5) — and on the strength of that failure, they ask for a king. Deuteronomy 16:18's vision of justice "in all thy gates" did not fail because the institution was wrong. It failed because the people inside it were corruptible, and corruptible people will eventually corrupt any institution placed in their hands. The commandment establishes the gate. It cannot, by itself, guarantee what happens at it.

City by City, Throughout All the Fenced Cities of Judah

וַיֹּאמֶר אֶל הַשֹּׁפְטִים רְאוּ מָה אַתֶּם עֹשִׂים כִּי לֹא לְאָדָם תִּשְׁפְּטוּ כִּי לַיהוָה וְעִמָּכֶם בִּדְבַר הַמִּשְׁפָּט
"And said to the judges, Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the LORD, who is with you in the judgment."

Centuries later, a king takes Deuteronomy 16:18 and rebuilds it from the ground up. King Jehoshaphat of Judah, returning from a near-disastrous alliance with the house of Ahab (2 Chronicles 18), is confronted by a prophet's rebuke — and his response is not merely personal repentance. 2 Chronicles 19:5 records: "And he set judges in the land throughout all the fenced cities of Judah, city by city." This is Deuteronomy 16:18 enacted almost word for word — judges, in every city, in every gate.

And then Jehoshaphat does something Samuel's sons' story shows was missing the first time: he charges the judges directly, in person, with the standard they are to be held to. "Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the LORD, who is with you in the judgment" (2 Chronicles 19:6). The institution Deuteronomy 16:18 commands is necessary but not sufficient. Jehoshaphat's reform supplies the second piece — not just judges in the gates, but judges reminded, by the king himself, of whose judgment they are actually executing.

Key Figures

*
Samuel's Sons — The Gate Corrupted
Made judges by their father, Samuel's sons "turned aside after lucre, and took bribes, and perverted judgment" (1 Samuel 8:3), showing that Deuteronomy 16:18's institution can be filled by people who betray its purpose — even when appointed by a prophet.
+
Jehoshaphat — The Gate Rebuilt
After his own near-disaster, Jehoshaphat "set judges in the land throughout all the fenced cities of Judah, city by city" (2 Chronicles 19:5) and charged them, "ye judge not for man, but for the LORD" (2 Chronicles 19:6) — Deuteronomy 16:18 restored, with the missing piece supplied.

Study Questions

For reflection and group study
Deuteronomy 16:18 commands judges 'in all thy gates' — local courts, not one central tribunal. What might be gained, and what might be risked, by placing justice close to where people actually live?
Samuel's sons were made judges by their own father, yet 'turned aside after lucre, and took bribes, and perverted judgment' (1 Samuel 8:3). What does it suggest that even a prophet's direct appointment was not enough to prevent corruption?
The elders told Samuel plainly, 'thy sons walk not in thy ways' (1 Samuel 8:5), and used that failure to ask for a king. Do you think the failure of one institution justifies replacing it with a different kind of institution entirely?
Jehoshaphat both appointed judges 'city by city' (2 Chronicles 19:5) and personally charged them with their standard (2 Chronicles 19:6). Why might appointing the right people and instructing them be two separate steps, rather than one?
Jehoshaphat told the judges, 'ye judge not for man, but for the LORD, who is with you in the judgment.' How might a judge's sense of who they are ultimately answerable to change the way they handle a difficult case?

Deuteronomy 16:18 establishes courts in every gate — necessary, as Samuel's sons' corruption shows, but not sufficient until judges are reminded, as Jehoshaphat reminded his, whose judgment they carry out.

Open Deuteronomy 16:18 in Torah Reader