The Laws › Commandment #184
Commandment #184 · Positive · Social & Ethical Laws

She Shall Not Go Out as the Male Slaves Do: The Hebrew Female Slave

אָמָה עִבְרִיָּה
Source: Exodus 21:7  ·  Maimonides, Sefer HaMitzvot, Positive #234

Immediately following the law of the Hebrew male slave (Commandment #183), Exodus 21:7 opens the laws of the amah ivrit — the Hebrew female slave. The key difference is stated at once: “she shall not go out as the male slaves do.” The male slave’s sixth-year term and seventh-year release are not her framework. She is sold with a view to marriage — either to the master himself or to his son (Exodus 21:8). The Torah’s concern is entirely for her protection within that arrangement.

She Shall Not Go Out as the Male Slaves Do

וְכִי יִמְכֹּר אִישׁ אֶת בִּתּוֹ לְאָמָה לֹא תֵצֵא כְּצֵאת הָעֲבָדִים
"When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do."

The amah (female slave/maidservant) is sold by her father — typically a minor, often with the intention that she will become a wife in the master’s household. Exodus 21:89 describes the expected outcome: she is designated for the master (“if she does not please her master who has designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed”) or for his son (“if he designates her for his son, he shall deal with her as with a daughter”). The father’s sale is not abandonment but a form of betrothal arrangement within a household. If the designated marriage does not occur, she must be redeemed — the master cannot simply sell her to a foreign people.

Her Three Rights: Food, Clothing, Marital Rights

וְאִם לִבְנוֹ יִיעָדֶנָּה כְּמִשְׁפַּט הַבָּנוֹת יַעֲשֶׂה לָּהּ
"If he designates her for his son, he shall deal with her as with a daughter."

Exodus 21:10 states the three inviolable rights of the amah if the master takes another wife: (1) her food shall not be diminished, (2) her clothing shall not be diminished, (3) her conjugal rights shall not be diminished. These three rights — sheir, kesut, onah — become the Talmudic basis for the three foundational marital obligations a husband owes any wife (Ketubbot 47b). The amah’s protections seep into general marriage law: what is owed to the most vulnerable wife becomes the minimum owed to every wife.

Key Figures

*
Hagar: The Egyptian Handmaid
Genesis 16 records Sarah giving her handmaid Hagar to Abraham as a wife when Sarah could not conceive. The arrangement reflects the ancient Near Eastern context within which Exodus 21:7–11’s laws operate: a female servant’s transition into a marital relationship with the household head. Hagar’s subsequent suffering when Sarah despised her (16:6) is precisely the kind of wrong Exodus 21:10’s protection against diminishing rights was designed to prevent.
+
The Daughters of Zelophehad
Numbers 27 records five daughters successfully petitioning Moses for their father’s inheritance. The episode establishes that daughters have legal standing to claim and hold property — a principle that undergirds the Torah’s concern for the amah’s rights. The Torah is not indifferent to daughters’ legal protections; the Zelophehad ruling shows it will legislate actively to ensure them.

Study Questions

For reflection and group study
What does “she shall not go out as the male slaves do” (Exodus 21:7) reveal about the different purpose and framework of the female slave’s term of service?
What three options does Exodus 21:8–9 describe for the amah’s relationship to the master’s household, and what protection is given if none is realized?
What are the three inviolable rights established in Exodus 21:10, and how do they become the basis for general marital law in the Talmud (Ketubbot 47b)?
How does the amah’s situation in Exodus 21:7–11 reflect the Torah’s broader pattern of protecting the most vulnerable member of a household arrangement?
How does Hagar’s story in Genesis 16 illuminate the kind of wrong the protections in Exodus 21:10 were designed to prevent?

Read the full passage in the Torah reader.

Open Exodus 21 in the Bible Reader