Thou Shalt Not Hate Thy Brother: The Commandment to Rebuke
'Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him.' Leviticus 19:17 names silent resentment and honest rebuke as the only two paths available when a neighbor wrongs you — and treats the first as a sin in itself. Scripture's clearest demonstration is Nathan's rebuke of King David: a parable that let David condemn his own act before Nathan ever spoke the words 'Thou art the man,' followed by four words from David that show what a rebuke is for — 'I have sinned against the LORD.'
Thou Shalt Not Hate Thy Brother in Thine Heart
The verse presents two paths and forbids one of them. The forbidden path is silent hatred — resentment that festers in the heart, never spoken, never resolved. The commanded alternative is not silence's opposite in the sense of venting anger, but something more demanding: "thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour." Say something. Say it to him. And the reason given is striking — "and not suffer sin upon him" — as though staying silent while a neighbor sins is itself a way of sharing in that sin, a debt left unpaid on both sides.
This is the same chapter that gave #133 its command to revere mother and father, and #134 its command to rise before the aged — Leviticus 19 is a chapter about what is owed between people who live in close proximity to one another for a lifetime. Rebuke, in this framing, is not the opposite of love. Hatred-in-the-heart is the opposite of love. Rebuke is what love does instead of hating.
Thou Art the Man
Scripture's most famous rebuke is also one of its most carefully staged. After David's sin with Bathsheba and the killing of Uriah, the prophet Nathan does not walk into the palace and announce the king's crime. He tells a story — a poor man with one little ewe lamb, "which he had bought, and nourished up," and a rich man who, having flocks of his own, takes the poor man's lamb for a guest's feast (2 Samuel 12:1-4). David, hearing it as a legal case brought before the king, is furious: "the man that hath done this thing shall surely die" (2 Samuel 12:5).
Only then does Nathan close the trap: "Thou art the man." The rebuke lands precisely because David has already, unknowingly, passed judgment on himself. What follows is the part Leviticus 19:17 is really asking for — not the accusation alone, but what the accusation makes possible. David's answer is four words: "I have sinned against the LORD" (2 Samuel 12:13). Nathan's rebuke did not destroy David. It gave him a sin he could finally name, and a name is the first thing a person needs in order to put a thing down.
Restore Such an One in the Spirit of Meekness
The New Testament inherits this same logic and gives it a method. Galatians 6:1 reads: "Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted." The goal named here is restoration, not exposure — and the posture commanded is meekness, with a built-in check: remember that you, too, could be the one overtaken next.
Put this beside Nathan and David. Nathan did not rebuke David from a position of safety — a prophet correcting a king risks everything. And he did not rebuke him to humiliate him in front of the court; the confrontation in 2 Samuel 12 reads as private. "Not suffer sin upon him" (Leviticus 19:17) and "restore such an one in the spirit of meekness" (Galatians 6:1) describe the same act from two ends of Scripture: love that will not let a sin sit unaddressed, delivered in a way that leaves room for the other person to come back.
Key Figures
Study Questions
Honest rebuke, offered to restore rather than to condemn, is what Leviticus 19:17 commands in place of silent hatred — and what let David answer Nathan with confession instead of denial.
Open Leviticus 19:17 in Torah Reader