EN ES
The Laws › Commandment #341
Commandment #341 · Negative · Cities of Refuge · Justice

Do Not Ransom an Accidental Killer from the City of Refuge

לֹא לִקַּח כֹּפֶר מִגּוֹלֶה
Source: Numbers 35:32  ·  Maimonides, Sefer HaMitzvot, Negative #590
וְלֹא תִקְחוּ כֹפֶר לָנוּס אֶל עִיר מִקְלָטוֹ לָשׁוּב לָשֶׁבֶת בָּאָרֶץ עַד מוֹת הַכֹּהֵן
“And ye shall take no satisfaction for him that is fled to the city of his refuge, that he should come again to dwell in the land, until the death of the priest.”

The Six Cities and the Goel Ha-Dam

Numbers 35:9–28 establishes the cities of refuge as the Torah's solution to a problem every ancient society faced: what happens when a death occurs without malicious intent? Without a formal mechanism, the family of the deceased — the goel ha-dam, the blood avenger — would pursue the killer. The Torah does not eliminate the goel ha-dam; it channels the impulse by giving it a legal structure. The accidental killer may flee to a city of refuge. The goel ha-dam may not follow within the city's boundaries. The congregation adjudicates the case. If the death was genuinely accidental, the killer remains in the city under protection.

The six cities — Kedesh in Galilee, Shechem in Ephraim, Kiriat Arba (Hebron) in Yehudah, Bezer in the Reuben territory, Ramot in Gilead, and Golan in Bashan — were distributed across the land so that no part of Israel was too far from refuge. Joshua 20 records their formal designation. The Talmud adds that roads to the cities of refuge were maintained and signposted so that a killer fleeing in panic could find the way quickly. The legal infrastructure of mercy was built with the same care as the legal infrastructure of justice.

Numbers 35:25: “And the congregation shall deliver the slayer out of the hand of the revenger of blood, and the congregation shall restore him to the city of his refuge, whither he was fled: and he shall abide in it unto the death of the high priest, which was anointed with the holy oil.” The city of refuge is not a prison — it is a place of protected life. The accidental killer may live, work, learn, and worship within it. What they cannot do is return home. The exile is the cost, and it is paid in time, not in gold.

Why No Ransom Can Substitute

Commandment #341 closes a potential loophole in the system. A wealthy accidental killer might argue: I can pay the victim's family, make them whole financially, and return home early. Numbers 35:32 explicitly closes this avenue: “ye shall take no satisfaction for him that is fled to the city of his refuge, that he should come again to dwell in the land, until the death of the priest.” The word kofer (satisfaction/ransom) is the same word used in verse 31 for the murderer: no ransom for either. The accidental killer's exile is not a debt to the victim's family that can be paid off. It serves a different function: communal atonement for the blood that was spilled.

The underlying principle the Torah articulates here is that human life does not have a monetary equivalent. Numbers 35:33 states: “So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye are: for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it.” The land is defiled by bloodshed. The mechanism of cleansing is death — either the death of the killer (for intentional murder) or the death of the High Priest (for accidental killing). No payment purifies the land. The ordained time cannot be purchased away.

The High Priest's Death as the Atonement Mechanism

The connection between the High Priest's death and the accidental killer's release points to one of the Torah's deepest structural principles: atonement works through appointed sacrifice, not financial substitution. The Talmud (Makkot 11b) notes that when an accidental killer returned home upon the High Priest's death, the goel ha-dam could no longer pursue them — the matter was fully resolved. The High Priest's death had performed its atoning function for the community.

This mechanism has a sobering personal dimension. Mothers of High Priests, knowing that an early death of their son would release accidental killers, would sometimes bring food and clothing to those exiled in cities of refuge, hoping to be remembered in their prayers so that those exiles would not pray for their sons' deaths (Makkot 11a). The web of spiritual accountability the Torah weaves runs in every direction: the communal leader whose anointing oil carries the community's sins, the individual whose momentary lapse costs another their life, and the families of both — all caught in the same system of consequence and mercy.

For reflection and group study
The city of refuge protects the accidental killer from the goel ha-dam while also requiring exile. The Torah creates a structure that holds both justice (the death was real, a cost must be paid) and mercy (the killer did not intend it, death is not the punishment). What does commandment #341’s prohibition on ransom reveal about how the Torah balances these two values? Is the exile itself the mercy, or is the mercy the protection from the goel ha-dam, with the exile being the justice?
The accidental killer’s release is tied to the High Priest’s death — an event entirely outside the killer’s control. The duration of exile cannot be calculated in advance. What does it mean to have the length of your consequence determined by the life of another person? What does this structure reveal about the Torah’s understanding of communal interconnection and individual fate?

Read the source passage in the Torah reader.

Read in the Torah Reader — Numbers 35