What is the difference between “lo tachmod” (commandment #382) and “lo titaveh” (commandment #539)?

Both come from the tenth commandment cluster, but from different textual formulations. Lo tachmod (Ex 20:17, commandment #382) is violated, according to Rambam (Hilkhot Gezelah 1:9), when one takes action based on desire — pressuring someone to sell, scheming to acquire. Lo titaveh (Deut 5:21, commandment #539) is violated by the mental state itself, without any action. The desire alone, if cultivated and sustained, transgresses commandment #539. This makes #383 the most interior commandment of the 613: it requires no external act, only an inner state of settled longing for what belongs to another.

How can a commandment be violated by thought alone, without any action?

Rambam (Hilkhot Gezelah 1:9-10) explains that lo titaveh is violated when one deliberately cultivates and sustains desire for another's property. A momentary impulse is not a violation — the prohibition targets the settled, nurtured longing that the person feeds and maintains. The Talmud (Bava Metzia 5b) further specifies: persistent contemplation of how to acquire what belongs to another crosses the line even before any overt scheming. The covenant's claim over the inner life reflects the Torah's understanding that behavior originates in desire: breaking the chain at the source of desire is the most effective prohibition.

How does Ahab's story illustrate commandment #539?

1 Kings 21 traces the exact sequence the tenth commandment targets. Ahab desired (titaveh root) Naboth's vineyard (v.1-2). When refused, he became 'vexed and sullen' and refused to eat (v.4) — the cultivated, nurtured desire producing distress. Jezebel arranged false witnesses; Naboth was executed; Ahab took the vineyard (v.5-16). The prophet Elijah confronted him (v.19). Ahab did not directly commit false witness or murder — Jezebel did. But his desire (#383) was the chain's source. The narrative shows how unchecked desire produces false witness (#413), murder (#465), and theft — the very commandments surrounding lo titaveh in the Decalogue sequence.

Why does Deuteronomy 5:21 split “wife” and “house” into separate clauses?

In Exodus 20:17, the commandment uses 'lo tachmod' for both the neighbor's wife and his house/property. Deuteronomy 5:21 separates them: 'lo tachmod' for the wife and 'lo titaveh' for the house and property. The Talmud (Bava Kamma 54b) and Rambam derive two distinct commandments from this split. The wife-specific clause (commandment #382) reflects the interpersonal relational domain where desire can motivate direct action (adultery); the property clause (commandment #539) reflects the material domain where the prohibition targets the inner state of longing itself. The Deuteronomy version's differentiation allows the oral Torah to derive two distinct prohibitions covering different aspects of covetous desire.

Commandment #383 · Negative #383

Do Not Desire What Belongs to Others

לֹא תִתְאַוֶּה

Deuteronomy 5:21 · Social & Ethical Laws

וְלֹא תַחְמֹד אֵשֶׁת רֵעֶךָ וְלֹא תִתְאַוֶּה בֵּית רֵעֶךָ שָׂדֵהוּ וְעַבְדּוֹ וַאֲמָתוֹ שׁוֹרוֹ וַחֲמֹרוֹ וְכֹל אֲשֶׁר לְרֵעֶךָ

“And you shall not covet your neighbor's wife. And you shall not desire your neighbor's house, his field, or his male servant, or his female servant, his ox, or his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor's”

Deuteronomy 5:21 — Open in Reader

Lo Titaveh — The Deuteronomy Formulation

Deuteronomy 5:21: “And you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife. And you shall not desire (lo titaveh) your neighbor’s house, his field, or his male servant, or his female servant, his ox, or his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor’s.” Commandment #383 is the Deuteronomy version of the tenth commandment. The Exodus version (Ex 20:17) uses “lo tachmod” (do not covet) for both the wife and the house; the Deuteronomy version splits the commandment into two: “lo tachmod” for the wife and “lo titaveh” (do not desire) for the house and property.

Rambam (Hilkhot Gezelah 1:9–10) distinguishes the two: “lo tachmod” (#382) is violated when one takes action based on desire — pressuring someone to sell, arranging to acquire through schemes. “Lo titaveh” (#383) is violated by the mental state itself, without any action. The desire alone, before it motivates any behavior, transgresses commandment #539. This makes #383 the most interior commandment in the entire 613: a violation that occurs entirely within the mind, with no external act required.

The Inner Life as Covenant Domain

The tenth commandment group (#382 lo tachmod, #383 lo titaveh) is unique in the Decalogue: all other commandments prohibit actions (murder, adultery, theft, false witness). These two prohibit states of mind. The Torah’s claim that desire itself is subject to covenant law is theologically radical — God is not only the judge of behavior but of the inner life. Ezekiel 14:4–5: “Every man of the house of Israel who sets up his idols in his heart and puts the stumbling block of his iniquity before his face... I the LORD will answer him by myself. I will do it that I may lay hold of the hearts of the house of Israel.” The prophets describe God addressing “the idols of their hearts” — not just what people worship outwardly but what they desire internally.

The Talmud (Bava Metzia 5b) notes a practical dimension: “lo titaveh” can be violated by the persistent contemplation of how to acquire what belongs to another. When the desire moves from an initial emotional response to a sustained, cultivated longing — even before any action is taken — the commandment is breached. This is not a counsel to eliminate natural impulses but a prohibition on nurturing and feeding them. The distinction is between a momentary desire (not a violation) and a settled, deliberate desire (a violation). The inner life is a domain of the covenant, not merely a precondition for covenant action.

Ahab and Naboth — The Progression from Desire to Death

1 Kings 21:1–4: “Now Naboth the Jezreelite had a vineyard in Jezreel, beside the palace of Ahab king of Samaria. And after this Ahab said to Naboth, ‘Give me your vineyard, that I may have it for a vegetable garden, because it is near my house.’ But Naboth said to Ahab, ‘The LORD forbid that I should give you the inheritance of my fathers.’ And Ahab went into his house vexed and sullen because of what Naboth the Jezreelite had said to him, for he had said, ‘I will not give you the inheritance of my fathers.’ And he lay down on his bed and turned away his face and would eat no food.”

The sequence is precise: Ahab desired the vineyard (“lo titaveh,” commandment #539) → he expressed the desire and was refused → he was “vexed and sullen” (the nurtured desire creating distress) → Jezebel arranged false witnesses → Naboth was executed for blasphemy → Ahab took the vineyard. The prophet Elijah confronted him: 1 Kings 21:19: “Thus says the LORD: ‘In the place where dogs licked up the blood of Naboth, dogs shall lick your own blood.’” Ahab had not killed Naboth himself — Jezebel did that — but the desire (#383) was the source of the chain that led through false witness (#413) to murder (#465). The tenth commandment’s prohibition of desire is the covenant’s attempt to break this chain at its source.

Ahab king of Israel — 1 Kgs 21:1–19: desired Naboth’s vineyard (commandment #539), grew vexed and sullen, allowed Jezebel to arrange false witness and murder, then took the vineyard. Elijah’s confrontation names the desire as the source of the chain: “You have murdered and also taken possession.”
Ezekiel — Ezek 14:4–5: “Every man who sets up his idols in his heart... I will do it to lay hold of the hearts of the house of Israel.” The prophet describes God addressing the inner life directly — the idols of the heart, not only the idols of the shrine. The same theological domain that commandment #539 legislates.
Deuteronomy 5:21 vs Exodus 20:17 — Deut 5:21 vs Ex 20:17: the Deuteronomy version splits the commandment into “lo tachmod” (wife) and “lo titaveh” (property), enabling the oral Torah to derive two distinct commandments. The Exodus version uses “lo tachmod” for both.

For reflection and group study

Commandment #383 is violated by the inner mental state of sustained desire — without any external action. This makes it the most interior of the 613 commandments. How does the covenant's claim over the inner life relate to its other declarations about accountability and intent? Is the Torah primarily a legal system governing behavior, or does commandment #539 reveal that it is fundamentally concerned with the formation of persons — their desires, not just their actions?

See Deuteronomy 5:21 — Open in Reader

Ahab desired Naboth's vineyard; the desire led to false witness, murder, and theft — with Jezebel as the intermediary actor. Ahab did not directly commit the crimes, but Elijah held him accountable as if he had (1 Kgs 21:19). What does this accountability structure — the desire (#383) as morally responsible for the chain of events it set in motion — reveal about the Torah's understanding of moral causation? Is the person who desires, and who allows that desire to persist, responsible for what the desire eventually produces through others?

See 1 Kgs 21:19

Read the source passage in the Torah reader.

Read in the Torah Reader — Deuteronomy 5:21

← Do Not Subtract from the Commandments Do Not Kidnap →