EN ES
The Laws › Commandment #362
Commandment #362 · Negative · Truth Ethics · Covenant Integrity

Do Not Prophesy Falsely

לֹא לְהִתְנַבֵּא
Source: Deuteronomy 18:20  ·  Maimonides, Sefer HaMitzvot, Negative #611
אַךְ הַנָּבִיא אֲשֶׁר יָזִיד לְדַבֵּר דָּבָר בִּשְׁמִי אֵת אֲשֶׁר לֹא צִוִּיתִיו לְדַבֵּר וַאֲשֶׁר יְדַבֵּר בְּשֵׁם אֱלֹהִים אֲחֵרִים וּמֵת הַנָּבִיא הַהוּא
“But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.”

Two Forms of False Prophecy

Deuteronomy 18:20: “the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.” The verse defines two distinct violations. First: claiming divine authorization for a message God did not send — a false message delivered in the name of the true God. Second: speaking in the name of other gods — a denial of the covenant’s exclusive claim altogether. Rambam (Hilkhot Yesodei haTorah 9:1–2) treats these as two separate prohibitions with the same penalty: death at the hands of the court. Both corrupt the mechanism of divine communication that makes Torah possible.

The Talmud (Sanhedrin 89a) adds a third category: a prophet who suppresses a prophecy God did command him to give. All three share the feature of perverting the prophetic channel. The channel works only if what is spoken matches what was received. A false prophet who adds, a false prophet who substitutes, and a prophet who withholds — all three break the correspondence between divine speech and prophetic declaration that the entire covenant depends on.

Hananiah ben Azzur — The False Prophet in Action

Jeremiah 28:1–17: In the fourth year of Zedekiah, Hananiah son of Azzur stood in the Temple and prophesied: “Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: I have broken the yoke of the king of Babylon. Within two years I will bring back to this place all the vessels of the LORD’s house that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon took away from this place to Babylon.” He was specific, hopeful, and publicly authoritative. He attributed his message to YHWH. Jeremiah responded carefully: he wished the prophecy were true (Jer 28:6: “Amen! May the LORD do so; may the LORD make the words that you have prophesied come true”). But he then stated the prophetic tradition: prophets who predict peace are verified by fulfillment (Jer 28:9).

Hananiah then took the symbolic yoke from Jeremiah’s neck and broke it, saying the LORD would break the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar (Jer 28:10–11). The LORD responded through Jeremiah: the wooden yoke was broken, but an iron yoke would replace it (Jer 28:13–14). The verdict was delivered directly: “Listen, Hananiah, the LORD has not sent you, and you have made this people trust in a lie. Therefore, says the LORD: behold, I will remove you from the face of the earth. This year you shall die, because you have uttered rebellion against the LORD” (Jer 28:15–16). Jeremiah 28:17: “In that same year, in the seventh month, Hananiah the prophet died.” The false prophecy was falsified within months.

The Four Hundred Against Micaiah — Mass False Prophecy

1 Kings 22:1–28: Ahab wanted to retake Ramoth-gilead from Aram. He assembled four hundred prophets who unanimously declared victory: “Go up, for the Lord will give it into the hand of the king” (1 Kgs 22:6). Jehoshaphat of Judah asked for another prophet. Ahab admitted: “There is still one man by whom we may inquire of the LORD, Micaiah the son of Imlah; but I hate him, for he never prophesies good concerning me, but evil” (1 Kgs 22:8). Micaiah, when brought, first ironically confirmed the four hundred (v.15), then revealed the true divine vision: Israel scattered on the mountains, their king fallen (1 Kgs 22:17). He described how God permitted a lying spirit to fill the four hundred prophets’ mouths (1 Kgs 22:19–23).

Ahab proceeded anyway. He was struck by an arrow at Ramoth-gilead and died (1 Kgs 22:34–38). The four hundred prophets were wrong. Micaiah was imprisoned for the truth and vindicated by history. The pattern is the governing pattern of false prophecy in the Hebrew scriptures: the false prophet is plausible, popular, institutionally supported, and wrong. The true prophet is marginal, unpopular, imprisoned or killed, and vindicated.

For reflection and group study
Hananiah prophesied peace and Jeremiah prophesied disaster. Both claimed to speak in God’s name. Jeremiah’s test was historical: the prophet who predicts peace is verified by fulfillment (Jer 28:9). Before the fulfillment, how was the community to know which prophet to believe? What does the impossibility of real-time verification reveal about the role of faith in prophetic reception?
The four hundred prophets of Ahab prophesied unanimously. Micaiah stood alone. God told Micaiah that a lying spirit had filled the four hundred’s mouths (1 Kgs 22:19–23). What does this passage reveal about the relationship between institutional prophetic consensus and divine truth? Is the majority of prophets a reliable guide to the divine will?

Read the source passage in the Torah reader.

Read in the Torah Reader — Deuteronomy 18:20