EN ES
HomeThe Laws › Commandment #518
Commandment #518 · Negative #362

Do Not Have Relations with One’s Sister

לֹא תְגַלּה עֶרְוַת אֲחוֹתְךָ
Leviticus 18:9 · Family Laws
עֶרְוַת אֲחוֹתְךָ בַת אָבִיךָ אוֹ בַת אִמְךָ מוֹלֶדֶת בַיִת אוֹ מוֹלֶדֶת חוּץ לֹא תְגַלּה עֶרְוָתָן
“Do not have sexual relations with your sister, daughter of your father or your mother, whether born at home or born outside; do not have relations with them”

Full Sister and Half-Sister — The Breadth of the Prohibition

Leviticus 18:9: “Do not have sexual relations with your sister, daughter of your father or your mother, whether born at home or born outside; do not have relations with them.” The verse deliberately covers every permutation: paternal half-sister (same father, different mother), maternal half-sister (same mother, different father), and both household-born and born outside — a phrase the rabbis interpreted to include children born out of wedlock, illegitimate children who share a bloodline.

The prohibition derives from the principle that blood creates erva, regardless of legal marital status. A half-sister born of the same father but a different mother is equally prohibited as a full sister. The Torah’s word “achotecha” (your sister) is defined by the verse itself: any woman who shares either parent. The Talmud (Yevamot 97b) extends this analysis to discuss cases of uncertain paternity.

Amnon and Tamar — The Paradigm Violation

2 Samuel 13:1–14: Amnon, David’s firstborn, became obsessed with Tamar, his half-sister (both David’s children, different mothers). His friend Jonadab devised a scheme; Amnon feigned illness and requested that Tamar bring him food. Alone with him, he assaulted her. The text records Tamar’s words: “No, my brother, do not violate me, for such a thing is not done in Israel—do not do this disgraceful thing” (2 Sam 13:12).

Tamar says something remarkable: “Please speak to the king, for he will not withhold me from you” (2 Sam 13:13). She appears to believe David might permit such a marriage. The rabbis grappled with this: Sanhedrin 21a suggests Tamar was the daughter of a Canaanite captive woman whom David had married, making her technically Amnon’s half-sister by maternal line but not yet a full Israelite — a legal edge case that was later closed. Whatever the legal ambiguity, the narrative frames it unambiguously as a violation and a disgrace.

Absalom, Tamar’s full brother, waited two years and then killed Amnon (2 Sam 13:28–29). The narrative consequence is devastating: the rape of Tamar sets off the chain of events that would divide the Davidic house, produce Absalom’s rebellion, and end in multiple deaths. The Torah prohibition against sister-relations is not merely ceremonial — its violation set Israel’s royal line on a path of destruction.

Before the Law — Abraham and Sarah

Genesis 20:12: Abraham says to Abimelech: “Moreover, she is indeed my sister, the daughter of my father though not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife.” Abraham married a woman who was his half-sister by the paternal line — exactly what Leviticus 18:9 prohibits. The Torah records this without censure because, as with Amram and Jochebed (see commandment #521), the Sinaitic revelation replaced a less restrictive pre-Sinai framework.

The rabbis (Sanhedrin 58b) note that the Torah’s prohibitions were given at Sinai and are not retroactively applied to the patriarchs. Abraham’s marriage to Sarah represents a pre-Sinaitic relational structure that Sinai prohibited going forward. The same logic applies to Amnon’s case, except Amnon lived after Sinai — which is precisely why it is called a disgrace.

For reflection and group study
Tamar tells Amnon: “Please speak to the king, for he will not withhold me from you” (2 Sam 13:13). The rabbis debated whether David could actually have granted this (Sanhedrin 21a). If Tamar was technically outside the prohibition by some edge case of lineage, was she wrong to plead with Amnon to use the legal system rather than committing violence? What does her response reveal about how biblical women navigated law and coercion?
Abraham’s marriage to Sarah (Gen 20:12) is a pre-Sinai sister-marriage that Sinai then prohibited. Abraham’s descendants include Moses (via Amram/Jochebed, another pre-Sinai kin-marriage). The founder of the covenant people and the founder of the covenant law both emerge from unions Sinai would later prohibit. What does this tell us about the Torah’s self-understanding — does it present itself as revealing a timeless moral order, or as constructing a new one?

Read the source passage in the Torah reader.

Open in Torah Reader — Leviticus 18:9