What does Deuteronomy 24:4 prohibit exactly, and under what conditions?

Deuteronomy 24:4 prohibits the first husband from remarrying his divorced wife after she has been married to a second man. The prohibition is triggered when: (1) the first husband divorces his wife with a formal bill of divorcement (Deut 24:1); (2) she remarries another man; (3) the second husband either dies or divorces her. At that point, the first husband — who initiated the original divorce — may not take her back. The prohibition does not apply to a woman widowed from her first husband (who never divorced); it specifically targets the situation where the first husband willingly terminated the marriage and the wife subsequently married another man.

Why does the verse call remarriage in this scenario an “abomination before the LORD”?

The term 'toevat Adonai' (abomination before the LORD) in Deut 24:4 is the same strong language used in Lev 18 for the sexual prohibitions. The rabbis (Gittin 90b) explain: the prohibition targets a potential scheme where the first husband orchestrates the sequence — divorce, second marriage, return — for economic advantage. The second marriage would be used instrumentally, not genuinely. The 'abomination' language reflects the Torah's moral judgment on a manipulative use of the legal divorce-and-remarriage system. The second husband's place in the woman's life must be treated as genuine and permanent, not as an intermediate step.

How does Jeremiah 3 use this commandment as a theological argument?

Jeremiah 3:1 opens by citing Deuteronomy 24:4 directly: 'If a man divorces his wife and she leaves him and marries another man, should he return to her again? Would not the land be greatly polluted?' He then applies the analogy to Israel, who has 'played the harlot with many lovers' through idol worship. The legal answer from Deut 24:4 is: no, the divorced-and-remarried woman cannot return to her first husband. But then God says (v.12-14): 'Return, faithless Israel... I will not look on you in anger.' Jeremiah uses the very commandment that prohibits return to intensify the grace of God's offer: it transcends what the human legal framework permits.

What does the phrase “after she has been defiled” (hotamma) mean in Deuteronomy 24:4?

The phrase 'hotamma' (she has been defiled/made unclean) refers not to moral defilement but to a legal-relational status change created by the second marriage. The woman is not morally guilty — the second marriage was entirely lawful. But she has become relationally bound to the second man in a way that cannot be undone relative to the first husband. The rabbis (Yevamot 11b) explain that the second marriage creates a new status: the first marital relationship cannot be restored after it. The 'defilement' is the legal-relational term for the irreversible change in her status relative to the first husband — not a judgment on the woman's moral character.

Commandment #372 · Negative #372

Do Not Remarry Your Divorced Wife After She Has Remarried

לֹא יָשׁוּב לְקַחְתָּהּ

Deuteronomy 24:4 · Family Laws

לֹא יוּכַל בַּעְלָהּ הָרִאשׁוֹן אֲשֶׁר שִׁלְּחָהּ לָשׁוּב לְקַחְתָּהּ לִהְיוֹת לוֹ לְאִשָּׁה אַחֲרֵי אֲשֶׁר הֻטַּמְּאָה כִּי תוֹעֵבָה הִוא לִפְנֵי יְהוָה

“Then her former husband, who sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife after she has been defiled, for that is an abomination before the LORD”

Deuteronomy 24:4 — Open in Reader

The Prohibition and Its Legal Context

Deuteronomy 24:4: “Then her former husband, who sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife after she has been defiled, for that is an abomination before the LORD.” The passage (Deut 24:1–4) is the Torah’s primary divorce legislation. Verses 1–3 describe the scenario: a man divorces his wife, she remarries another man, and the second husband dies or also divorces her. Verse 4 then prohibits the first husband from taking her back. The prohibition is absolute: once the woman has been married to another man, the first husband may not remarry her. The verse calls the act an “abomination before the LORD” (toevat Adonai).

The key interpretive issue is the phrase “after she has been defiled” (“hotamma”). The first husband is described as unable to take her back because she has been defiled. But defiled how, and by whom? The rabbinic tradition (Yevamot 11b) explains: the second marriage itself has created a new status. The woman is not defiled in a moral sense — the second marriage was entirely legal — but in the sense that the first marital relationship cannot be restored after she has been in another man’s household. The defilement is relational-legal, not moral.

Jeremiah’s Use of This Law — Israel as the Divorced Wife

Jeremiah 3:1–4: “If a man divorces his wife and she leaves him and marries another man, should he return to her again? Would not the land be greatly polluted? But you have played the harlot with many lovers — yet return to me, declares the LORD.” Jeremiah opens his chapter by citing Deuteronomy 24:4 explicitly: the law says the divorced and remarried woman cannot return to the first husband. Then God calls Israel — who has played the harlot with many lovers (idol worship) — to return anyway. The prophetic logic is not that the law is suspended but that what God is offering Israel exceeds the law’s framework: a restoration that the human legal system cannot perform.

The juxtaposition is intentional and theologically charged: the very commandment that prohibits remarriage (Deut 24:4) is cited by the prophet to emphasize the extraordinary nature of God’s continued willingness to take Israel back. If the human husband cannot take back his divorced and remarried wife, how much more scandalous and gracious is the divine offer to restore Israel despite her repeated unfaithfulness. Jeremiah 3:12–14: “Return, faithless Israel, declares the LORD. I will not look on you in anger, for I am merciful, declares the LORD; I will not be angry forever.” The whole chapter is Jeremiah’s meditation on Deuteronomy 24:4 applied to the covenant relationship.

Why the Prohibition Exists — Protecting Against Planned Schemes

The rabbis (Gittin 90b) explain the purpose of commandment #372: to prevent a man from arranging a strategic divorce — allowing his wife to marry a wealthy second husband, then divorcing or being widowed, and the first husband reclaiming her enriched. The prohibition cuts off a planned scheme where the first marriage, second marriage, and remarriage are all engineered for economic advantage. The second marriage must be genuine; the first husband cannot use the second marriage as an instrument of enrichment.

The Torah’s concern with economic manipulation through marriage law appears throughout Deuteronomy 24. Deuteronomy 24:5: the newly married man is exempt from military service for one year — “he shall be free at home one year to be happy with his wife whom he has taken.” The verse immediately following the remarriage prohibition shows that Deuteronomy 24’s marriage legislation is concerned with protecting the integrity of the marital relationship against instrumental use. Deuteronomy 24:1: the original divorce requires a written bill of divorcement — a formal, documented, non-reversible act. The prohibition on remarriage is the mirror image: once the divorce is fully executed and the second marriage complete, the first relationship is equally non-reversible.

Jeremiah — Jer 3:1–14: cites Deut 24:4 as the legal framework, then presents God’s offer to restore Israel as transcending the law’s limit. The prophet uses the prohibition to heighten the grace: if human law forbids this return, what God is offering Israel exceeds legal possibility.
Deuteronomy 24:1–4 — Deut 24:1–4: the Torah’s primary divorce legislation. Verses 1–3 establish the scenario; verse 4 states the prohibition on remarriage. The passage establishes divorce as a formal, documented, non-reversible act.
Deuteronomy 24:5 — Deut 24:5: immediately following the remarriage prohibition, the Torah exempts newlywed men from military service for one year. The two laws together show Deuteronomy 24’s concern: protecting the integrity of marriage against instrumental use.

For reflection and group study

Jeremiah 3 uses Deuteronomy 24:4 — the law that prohibits a divorced and remarried woman from returning to her first husband — as the baseline against which God's offer to Israel is measured. If human law forbids this, what God is offering is legally impossible by normal standards. What does the prophetic use of a legal prohibition as a rhetorical intensifier reveal about how the prophets understood the relationship between Torah law and the divine character? Does the law limit or illuminate what God does?

See Jeremiah 3 · Deuteronomy 24:4

The rabbis explain that commandment #372 prevents a husband from strategically divorcing his wife, allowing her to marry a wealthy second husband, then reclaiming her after the second marriage ends. The Torah calls such a scheme 'toevah before the LORD' — the same language used for the worst violations in Leviticus 18. What does using the strongest prohibitive language ('abomination') for an economic manipulation scheme reveal about the Torah's moral framework? Is the violation here primarily legal (manipulation of the legal system), relational (treating a person as an instrument), or something else?

See Leviticus 18

Read the source passage in the Torah reader.

Read in the Torah Reader — Deuteronomy 24:4

← The Kohen Gadol May Not Marry a Widow No Ammonite or Moabite in the Congregation →