Do Not Reduce the Rights of the Hebrew Slave at Release
The Severance Provisions — Grain, Wine, and Livestock
Deuteronomy 15:14: “You shall furnish him liberally out of your flock, out of your threshing floor, and out of your winepress. As the LORD your God has blessed you, you shall give to him.” The departing Hebrew slave does not leave empty-handed — he leaves with livestock, grain, and wine from the master’s abundance. These three categories represent the full range of agricultural wealth in ancient Israel: animals (meat, milk, transport), grain (the staple food), and wine (the staple drink). Together they constitute a start-up provision — enough to reestablish an independent household.
The formula “as the LORD your God has blessed you, you shall give to him” is proportional: the more the master has prospered during the six years of the slave’s service, the more he gives. This proportionality ensures that the severance is meaningful rather than merely symbolic. A wealthy master gives substantially; a modest master gives proportionally. And commandment #492 prohibits any reduction below what is appropriate to the master’s means: it is not a ceiling but a floor, and the floor rises with the master’s wealth.
Double Value — The Slave’s Labor Has Already Paid for the Severance
Deuteronomy 15:18: “It shall not seem hard to you when you let him go free from you; for he has been double value of a hired hand as he served you six years.” The prohibition rests on an economic argument: the Hebrew slave’s six years of labor have been worth double the going rate for a hired worker. At the standard wage of three years’ hire, six years of service would cost twice as much — but the slave cost only his purchase price plus maintenance. The master has received enormous economic surplus from the slave’s labor, and the severance provisions are fair compensation for that surplus.
This economic argument transforms the prohibition from a charity requirement into a justice requirement. The master who reduces the severance is not merely being ungenerous — he is withholding compensation that the slave’s labor has earned. The prohibition “do not reduce” (lo tigra’) is the negative formulation of a positive debt: the master owes the departing slave the provisions Deuteronomy 15:14 requires, because the slave’s labor has already paid for them. Reducing the severance is a form of theft at the moment of departure — taking back what has already been earned.
Hebrew Slavery and the Covenant Community’s Self-Understanding
The Hebrew slave laws of Exodus and Deuteronomy collectively constitute one of the Torah’s most distinctive social institutions. A fellow Israelite may become enslaved through poverty or debt — but this enslavement has built-in limitations: a six-year maximum (Exodus 21:2: “if you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing”), mandatory Shabbat rest (Exodus 20:10), restrictions on mistreatment, and now a generous severance. The Hebrew slave system is not primarily a labor system — it is a poverty-relief system with a built-in exit mechanism.
The severance provisions ensure that the exit mechanism is genuinely liberating, not merely nominal. A slave released without resources is technically free but practically destitute — likely to re-enter servitude immediately. The Torah’s severance provision gives the departing slave a real chance at independence. And the prohibition on reducing these provisions — “it shall not seem hard to you” — addresses the master’s psychological resistance to giving. The master who begrudges the departure and reduces the severance is failing the covenant’s vision of what slavery among Israelites is supposed to be: a temporary relief mechanism that ends with genuine restoration.
Read the source passage in the Torah reader.
Read in the Torah Reader