EN ES
HomeThe Laws › Do Not Wear Wool and Linen Mixed Together
Commandment #600 · Negative #444

Do Not Wear Wool and Linen Mixed Together

לֹא תִלְבַּשׁ שַׁעַטְנֵז
Deuteronomy 22:11 · Social & Ethical Laws
לֹא תִלְבַּשׁ שַׁעַטְנֵז צֶמֶר וּפִשְׁתִּים יַחְדָּו
“You shall not wear a garment of diverse kinds, wool and linen together.”

Kil'ayim — The Prohibition on Forbidden Mixtures

Deuteronomy 22:11: “You shall not wear a garment of shatnez, wool and linen together.” The word “shatnez” (שַׁעַטְנֵז) is technically analyzed in the Talmud (Niddah 61b) as a composite: sha’ut (combed), tevi (spun), and nuz (woven) — suggesting the prohibition covers fibers that are mixed at any stage of processing. The parallel commandment appears in Leviticus 19:19: “nor shall a garment of mixed linen and wool come upon you” alongside prohibitions on cross-breeding animals and mixing seeds in a field. The three kil'ayim prohibitions are united by a principle: God created the world with boundaries and categories, and these boundaries are to be respected rather than merged.

The Torah does not explain why these specific fibers may not be combined. This absence of rationale is itself significant. The Midrash teaches that when challenged by the “evil inclination” with “what reason can there be for this commandment?”, the response is: “It is a decree (chok) of the King, and we are not permitted to question it.” The chok is the commandment that tests whether obedience is conditioned on understanding. Observing it says: I follow this law because God commanded it, not because I have determined its rationale.

Priest and Commoner — Inversion at the Sacred Level

Exodus 28:6: the High Priest's ephod was made of gold, blue, purple, scarlet, and fine linen (shesh mashzar) worked together with specific threads. Some authorities hold that the Temple vestments incorporated the combination of wool and linen that the Shatnez prohibition forbids in ordinary contexts. If so, this follows the pattern of other prohibited things that are permitted or even required in Temple service: the Temple incense whose home-use is forbidden (Exodus 30:37–38), or the showbread which outsiders may not eat but which served the priests.

This inversion illuminates something about the nature of the prohibition. Wool (from animals, the world of living beings) and linen (from flax, the world of plants) represent different categories of creation. Their combination in ordinary clothing blurs a distinction that the Torah regards as real. But at the Temple — where the created order is integrated in divine service — the same combination may be permitted or required. The boundary that protects ordinary life from confusion may be transcended in the sacred context.

Observance Without Understanding — The Deepest Level of Faith

The Talmud (Yoma 67b) categorizes Shatnez alongside the red heifer, the scapegoat, and other chukim as commandments that “the nations of the world taunt Israel about.” Why do you keep commandments without rational basis? The response embedded in the structure of the chok is that keeping a commandment without knowing its reason is the highest form of obedience: it demonstrates that the relationship to God is not transactional or purely rational but covenantal — rooted in loyalty to the commander rather than evaluation of individual commands. Psalm 119:97: “O how love I your law! It is my meditation all the day.” The psalmist’s love of Torah is not contingent on understanding each law; it is love of the whole law as the expression of the divine relationship.

Modern Shatnez checking — the laboratory analysis of garment fibers to ensure no wool-linen combination — is the practical expression of this obedience. People send perfectly ordinary-looking garments to be checked not because they suspect a problem, but because the commandment applies regardless of visible evidence. The observance is an ongoing act of commitment to a law that cannot be verified by personal inspection — a form of trust.

◆ Study Questions
What does this commandment specifically forbid — naming both the materials and the act?
“Thou shalt not wear a garment of divers sorts, as of woollen and linen together.”
How does Leviticus 19:19 place this commandment alongside two other kil'ayim (forbidden mixture) prohibitions — and what do the three categories have in common?
“Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon thee.”
What does Ezekiel say about the linen and wool distinction in the garments of the priests — showing that the fabric prohibition was connected to sacred function?
“And it shall come to pass, that when they enter in at the gates of the inner court, they shall be clothed with linen garments.”
What does Yeshua quote from Deuteronomy when Satan tests him about turning stones to bread — showing that commandments without an obvious reason demand the same obedience as those with one?
“Man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live.”

Read the source passage in the Torah reader.

Read in the Torah Reader — Deuteronomy 22:11